Design and Validation of a Comprehensive Student–Teacher Education Model with Emphasis on the Fundamental Transformation Document of Education

Authors

    Ali Akbar Hamidi Department of Educational Philosophy, SR.C., Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran
    Sadegh Rezaei * Department of Educational Sciences, Amin University, Tehran, Iran Sadeghrezaee61@adu.ac.ir
    Alireza Osareh Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Rajaee University, Tehran, Iran
    Ruhollah Karimi Khoygani Department of Educational Sciences, Amin University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Comprehensive Education System, Student-Teacher, Farhangian University, Fundamental Transformation Document of Education

Abstract

The objective of this study was to design and validate a comprehensive student–teacher education model in Farhangian University based on the Fundamental Transformation Document of Education. This study employed an exploratory mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, 20 experts in teacher education and university administrators were selected through purposive sampling based on theoretical saturation. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding using MaxQDA. In the quantitative phase, the statistical population consisted of managers, deputies, faculty members, and student-teachers. A sample of 821 participants was determined using Cochran’s formula and cluster sampling. A researcher-made questionnaire with 41 items on a five-point Likert scale was administered. Instrument validity was assessed using face, content (CVR, CVI), and construct validity (CFA), and reliability was confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability. Data analysis was performed in SPSS-21 and Lisrel-8. Qualitative analysis identified eight core components out of 41 indicators: university management, educational evaluation, educational facilities, organizational structure, organizational culture, organizational support, trust, and social communication. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that all items had significant factor loadings (>0.72) with t-values above 1.96. Model fit indices were satisfactory (GFI=0.93, AGFI=0.91, CFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.07). A one-sample t-test evaluating expert judgment revealed that all model dimensions scored significantly above the expected mean (p<0.01), confirming strong model adequacy. The final model demonstrates strong empirical and theoretical validity and offers a comprehensive framework capable of enhancing student-teacher preparation and supporting the effective implementation of the Fundamental Transformation Document within Farhangian University.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, L., & Fazlikhani, M. A comparative study of the National Curriculum and the Fundamental Reform Document of Education. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/932332

Aboltina, L., Lama, G., Sarva, E., Kalke, B., Abolina, A., Daniela, L., & Bernande, M. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for the development of future teachers' professional competence in Latvia. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1307387. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1307387

Afrooz, D. (2015). An investigation of the existing challenges in the Fundamental Reform Document of Education. International Conference on New Research in Management and Industrial Engineering, https://www.sid.ir/paper/864691/fa

Bayat, M., & Ghaffari, A. Barriers to implementing the Fundamental Reform Document of Education. https://sid.ir/paper/802987/fa

Hajizadeh Anari, H. (2022). A conceptual model of Farhangian University based on the Fundamental Reform Document of Education. Teacher Education Policy Studies (Research in Teacher Education), 5(3), 115–145. https://te-research.cfu.ac.ir/article_2610.html

Hill-Jackson, V., & Lewis, C. W. (2023). Transforming teacher education: What went wrong with teacher training, and how we can fix it. Taylor & Francis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003448365/transforming-teacher-education-peter-mclaren-valerie-hill-jackson-chance-lewis

Hogg, L., Elvira, Q., & Yates, A. (2023). What can teacher educators learn from career-change teachers' perceptions and experiences: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104208

Hosseini, N., Leijgraaf, M., Gaikhorst, L., & Volman, M. (2025). Navigating Challenges and Tensions in Social Justice-Oriented Teacher Education: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251325572

Kennedy, A. (2024). Challenges in teacher education: Global influences and local solutions. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas(67), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24840/esc.vi67.779

Mathias, G., & Standal, Ø. F. (2025). What happens to the "social" in psychosocial? Exploring epistemic practices and therapeutic culture in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 153, 104818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104818

Mehrmohammadi, M. (2013). Analysis and evaluation of the formation of one of the most significant achievements of the Fundamental Reform Document (Farhangian University) from the perspective of change theories, with emphasis on teacher education curriculum components. National Conference of the Iranian Curriculum Studies Association (Curriculum Change in Educational Levels), https://civilica.com/doc/386335/

Mohan, R., & Somashekar, T. (2025). Teacher education. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. https://books.google.com/books/about/TEACHER_EDUCATION_SECOND_EDITION.html?id=cnrNDwAAQBAJ

Moradi, R., & Pourshafaei, H. (2013). The Fundamental Reform Document of the Educational System and its challenges. National Conference of the Iranian Curriculum Studies Association (Curriculum Change in Educational Levels), https://sid.ir/paper/851443/fa

Navidkia, A., Va'ezi, R., & Ghorbanizadeh, V. (2021). An examination of the implementation of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education. Public Policy in Management (Public Administration Mission), 12(43), 13–30. https://sid.ir/paper/410540/fa

Osorio Vanegas, H. D., Segovia Cifuentes, Y. D. M., & Sobrino Morrás, A. (2025). Educational Technology in Teacher Training: A Systematic Review of Competencies, Skills, Models, and Methods. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081036

Sjöblom, P., Eklund, G., & Fagerlund, P. (2023). Student teachers' views on outdoor education as a teaching method- two cases from Finland and Norway. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(3), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.2011338

Tambak, S., & Sukenti, D. (2023). Student involvement within Islamic teacher education: for a future profession. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 11(2), 317–352. https://repository.uir.ac.id/24376/1/2_student%20involment%20Within%20Islamic%20Teacher%20Education%20For%20a%20Future%20Profession.pdf

Zhukov, V., Popova, O., Altukhova, A., Boiarska-Khomenko, A., & Fomin, V. (2025). Moral and ethical culture of a future art teacher. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.1/944

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

Submitted

2025-06-22

Revised

2025-11-16

Accepted

2025-11-23

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Hamidi, A. A. . ., Rezaei, S., Osareh, A. ., & Karimi Khoygani, R. . (1405). Design and Validation of a Comprehensive Student–Teacher Education Model with Emphasis on the Fundamental Transformation Document of Education. Training, Education, and Sustainable Development, 1-17. https://www.journaltesd.com/index.php/tesd/article/view/286

Similar Articles

1-10 of 200

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.